London Calling (December 1991 | Volume: 42, Issue: 8)

London Calling

AH article image

Authors:

Historic Era:

Historic Theme:

Subject:

December 1991 | Volume 42, Issue 8

You may think they are inclined to make too much of New York, the lights of Manhattan, the extent of the prairies and the beauty of Niagara.” “They” are Americans, and I am in London’s Imperial War Museum, reading a pamphlet telling Britons how to cope with meeting one of us. “If you allow yourself to be irritated by their talk it will mean that you cannot find things to equal them in Britain. True, we have not got a Woolworth Building, but then neither has America got a thousand-year-old Tower of London.…” The flyer offers a few more cautionary notes—“Don’t talk about Chicago gangsters as if they represented 90% of the population of America”—and then concludes, “Most important of all, remember that every time you lose your temper with an American or refuse to understand him, you are fighting Hitler’s battles for him.”

Forty-five years have passed since the Yanks dispensed their final boasts about Niagara and the Woolworth Building and headed home, but the city they left behind is still eloquent of why they were there. London has little of the operatic feel of antiquity that, say, Rome imparts, but the past there has a way of hanging like fog in commonplace corners. In the 1930s F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote that London’s railroad stations were still sad from the Great War, and today the most mundane sights can suddenly resonate with a sense of the wounded, defiant city of half a century ago: the long descent into Marylebone Road Underground station, for instance, or steam rising from the counter of a sandwich shop early in the morning.

Moreover, Londoners seem uncommonly at home with the past. One night my wife and I ate in the north of the city in a room so obviously venerable that at the meal’s end I mentioned it to the waiter. “Oh, yes, sir,” he said, “this is a very old building.” How old? I asked. “It was built in 1929.” I was so surprised that he went off to seek confirmation. He was back in a minute. “I’m sorry, sir. It was 1629.”

 

The past is the past, and there’s been so much of it that the odd three centuries don’t signify for a great deal. Still, amid all the calamities and splendors that have been visited on this city, the Second World War is particularly evident. You can see it in the drab new buildings around St. Paul’s Cathedral; and in its simple refusal to dissolve under the Luftwaffe’s hammering, St. Paul’s itself has become as much a symbol of Winston Churchill’s day as of Christopher Wren’s. One night, dashing for cover across a little park under a black and apocalyptic deluge, I caught a teasingly familiar shape out of the corner of my eye and turned to find a bronze Franklin Roosevelt beaming superbly down at me.

But of course, not every one of London’s World War II associations is fortuitous. The Imperial