Authors:
Historic Era:
Historic Theme:
Subject:
April 1969 | Volume 20, Issue 3
Authors:
Historic Era:
Historic Theme:
Subject:
April 1969 | Volume 20, Issue 3
How did John Rarey do itt Was there a scientific basis to his amazing feats? Does his technique stand up in the light of current theories about animal psychology? In order to answer these questions, AMERICAN HERITAGE asked Dr. F. Dudley Klopfer of the department of psychology of Washington State University to read our article on Rarey. Here is Dr. Klopfer’s opinion.
At times the behavioral scientist, L. from some lofty pinnacle of mod- eni theory, can effectively predict the behavior of anjmals and successfully recommend the best procedure for taming them. It was Rarey’s genius to discover such techniques in the absence of any theory at all and more than half a century prior to any of the observations on which modern theory is based.
Much of the evolution of the horse occurred on plains and prairies, where flight was an effective mode of defense. Not only did horses become good runners; they became increasingly sensitive to and fearful of any unusual stimulation and developed a keen ability to learn from painful experience. Living in herds, because this provided familiarity in a potentially bewildering environment, they benefited from the presence of other horses who might detect predators or other dangers which a lone horse could miss. Chaotic relations within the herd were prevented and social status was enforced by mild punishment—nipping, crowding, or, more rarely, kicking. In time the horse became adept at using these kinds of social control to achieve its most desired objective, the withdrawal of opponents.
Although highly trainable, the horse is an animal that does not give up its vices under the application of strongly aversive stimulation, such as whipping or scolding, but withdraws instead. If it cannot flee, but is held in a stall or on a tether, then it bucks, rears, kicks, and bites. Often the presence of man is enough to set off this unfriendly behavior, and the animal is looked on as wild or vicious. Whether through its wildness the horse manages to escape, or whether its behavior drives the man away in fear, the result is the same: the vicious behavior is rewarded, and the horse is likely to repeat it. Wildness, in short, is learned; removing it is a matter for training.
Nearly forty years ago, E. R. Guthrie, the famous behaviorist, described one method of training that would not work: punishment. It simply produces the kind of behavior the tamer is trying to remove, and the tamer himself becomes the stimulus for further conditioned, i.e. , learned, wildness and viciousness. Guthrie described two methods that were effective in most cases. In the first, the toleration method, the animal while calm and quiet is confronted with the stimuli for the wild behavior, but only a little bit at a time; simultaneously, it is given plenty of positive stimulation—rubbing, patting, watering. Gradually from day to day the stimuli that once