Did The Federal Ban On Assault Weapons Matter?

Authors:

  • Sam Wang

Date Created:

Year Created: 2012

Collection this Document is Affiliated with:

Description: In this article, the author comments on the Sand Hook mass shooting in 2012 and aims to determine whether mass shootings are on the rise and whether a gun control law would make sense.

Categories of Documents:

Text of Document:

 

After the mass shooting of 20 children and 7 adults in Connecticut, I asked: (1) Are such shootings on the rise? and (2) Would a gun control law make a difference in such events?

 

In a situation like this, it is common to hear that the weapons used were acquired legally. This raises the issue of what would happen if the law changed. There is some evidence.

 

From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban was in place. Here is that period, shown on a graph of people killed or wounded in mass shootings since 1982.

 

The data came from an extensive tabulation by Mark Follman at Mother Jones. Except for 1999, a year of five shootings (including the Columbine massacre), the assault ban period was peaceful by US standards:

Years

Shootings

Per year

People shot/year

1982-1994

19

1.5

25.5

1995-2004

16

1.6

20.9

2005-2012

27

3.4*

54.8*

 

*p<0.05 compared with 1995-2004.

 

Since the expiration of the gun ban in 2004, the number of shootings per year has doubled, and the number of victims per year has nearly tripled. Three of the bloodiest four years shown here occurred since the expiration.

 

However, the assault-weapon-ban hypothesis does not explain why victims and shootings were not as common before 1994. Has something new happened in the last decade? War? Economic disruption? Lax monitoring of the mentally ill? Whatever the case, renewing the assault weapon ban as a route to pre-2005 conditions seems like a rational response to today’s horrific events.

 

Update: Using the FBI’s lower threshold for what constitutes a “mass” killing, this analysis by James Alan Fox suggests no change since 2004 in the number of incidents in which four or more people were killed. However, for a view of larger killings (in the US and abroad) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers:_Americas which is consistent with the trend I have described. In other words, these acts are always with us, but advanced weaponry creates an efficiency of scale to allow the possibility of large killings.